|
Latest Issue
 |
Incorporating Exposure, Surface Roughness, and Elevation
In wind resource assessment, the conventional approach to meteorological (met) mast siting has emphasised distance, recommending maintaining a maximum separation distance between each met site and the proposed wind turbine locations. This industry-accepted method assumes that shorter distances translate to better representativeness. But is distance truly the metric that matters most?
By Liz Walls and Erin Roekle, One Power Company, USA
| Turbine Shots
brought to you by
 |
 |
| #35 Vestas V80 2MW turbines installed in 2004 at Scroby Sands Offshore Windfarm, off the East coast of England at Great Yarmouth (courtesy David Goodfellow) |
| Every week on our website and in our email newsletter we want to show you that wind energy is more than just technology. We therefore invite you to send stunning pictures of wind turbines inspired by “light” (in the broadest sense of the word). After 52 submissions we will announce the winner of the year’s best picture! Email your photo to Include turbine model, location and name of photographer. (size of the published photo will be 336 px width x 280 px high). |
|
 Check our Instagram to see all published pictures |
Windtech International wants to make your visit to our website as pleasant as possible. That is why we place cookies on your computer that remember your preferences. With anonymous information about your site use you also help us to improve the website. Of course we will ask for your permission first. Click Accept to use all functions of the Windtech International website.
